logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.06.29 2017고단1297
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

The sentence against the accused shall be 2,00,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 17, 2017, the Defendant was aware of the fact that the Defendant committed a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment by causing a traffic accident, while driving C around 23:55, which was driven by B, and driving on a car and driving on the car in Gwangjubuk-gu, and driving on the E-lane in front of Gwangjubuk-gu, according to one lane among the three-lane roads in front of Gwangjubuk-gu, the Defendant committed a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment.

From the above temporary border B, the defendant stated that "N is driven by NN because it is possible to be detained in the course of a fine." The defendant will be held liable for the back of the accident.

Upon receipt of the request to the effect that “A person drives a vehicle at the scene of an accident”, he/she falsely states that he/she driven the vehicle at his/her own seat to the F and G of the Jeju Northern Police Station, who was dispatched to the scene of an accident, and on the same day, I driven the vehicle at his/her inside.

The submission of a false statement to the effect that “B,” made a false statement to conceal B, who is an actual driver, thereby allowing B to escape as an offender.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect B of the police;

1. Statement made by the police to J;

1. A written statement on the occurrence of traffic accidents;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on initial measures for traffic accidents;

1. Article 151 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 151 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is based on the following factors: (a) the sentencing conditions in the instant case, including the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, the background and result of the instant crime; and (b) the circumstances after the instant crime, etc., the sentence is determined as ordered.

A favorable normal situation: The defendant has been divided into and reflected in his mistake.

The defendant has no record of criminal punishment so far.

The defendant made a false statement as if he was the actual driver and brought about a confusion in the investigation.

arrow