beta
Text
1. The Defendant: 11,234,875 won to Plaintiff A; 11,234,875 won to Plaintiff C; and 67,409,250 won to Plaintiff D and each of the said money.
Reasons
1. Details, etc. of ruling;
(a) Project approval and public announcement - Project name: Urban planning facility project operator (E construction works): Seoul Special Metropolitan City Mayor - Public announcement of implementation plans:F announced on September 16, 2014;
B. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling of expropriation on April 21, 2016 - Expropriation date: June 14, 2016: - 1 square meter (hereinafter “G land”), H large 310 square meters (hereinafter “H land”), H large 310 square meters (hereinafter “each of the instant lands”), and compensation for each of the obstacles indicated in the separate sheet No. 1 attached hereto, etc. - Compensation for each of the instant lands: KRW 236,360,000 for each of the instant lands (i.e., KRW 760,60,000 for the H-owned share of KRW 235,60,000 for each of the instant lands); Plaintiff D’s co-ownership share of KRW 3/41,418,160 for each of the instant lands; Plaintiff’s co-ownership share of KRW 460,50,000 for each of the instant lands; Plaintiff’s co-ownership share of KRW 3/41,3601,4060
C. The Central Land Tribunal rendered an objection on November 24, 2016 - The Central Land Tribunal dismissed the Plaintiffs’ objection on each of the instant lands and each of the obstacles listed in the separate sheet No. 1 attached hereto.
- An appraisal corporation: An ordinary appraisal corporation, a corporation, and an exemplary appraisal corporation;
D. As a result of the appraisal by the court appraiser, the court appraiser I (hereinafter “court appraiser”) calculated the share of 1/8 of the Plaintiff A and C with respect to each of the instant lands as KRW 247,594,875, respectively (i.e., the share of G land KRW 796,125 KRW 246,798,750) and the share of 3/4 of Plaintiff D’s share with respect to each of the instant lands as KRW 1,485,569,250 (i.e., the share of 4,776,750 KRW 1,480,792,50).
[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), and the court.