logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2017.12.20 2017고단1283
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 31, 2007, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1 million for the same crime from the Daegu District Court Kimcheon on September 10, 201 and KRW 3 million for the same crime in the case of violation of Road Traffic Act in the resident support area of the Daegu District Court.

Criminal facts

1. On August 23, 2017, the Defendant: (a) driven a Daco-sports cargo vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.144% at a section of about 14 km in blood at the same time on the roads front of the 16:13 Gu-U.S. C. Samsung C, Samsung C., Samsung C., a city-U.S. C. on the same date.

Accordingly, although the defendant had been punished more than twice as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act, he once again driven a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol.

2. A person who is engaged in driving service of cargo vehicles as referred to in paragraph (1).

On August 23, 2017, the Defendant driven the above cargo vehicle around 16:13, while driving the F cafeteria in order to drive the road in front of the F cafeteria in the Gu-U.S. City, the Defendant continued the road in front of the F cafeteria in front of the Gu-U.S. city bus terminal.

At this point, a person engaged in driving motor vehicles with a center line of yellow solid lines has a duty of care to safely operate the steering motor vehicles by accurately manipulating the steering and steering gear.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and did not immediately stop the breath while under the influence of alcohol and failed to accurately operate the steering direction and brakes, as in paragraph 1, and did not stop the breath without permission, which was installed between the central line of the said road, and did not take necessary measures to prevent unauthorized crossing in the Daegu National Highway Management Office.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. G statements;

1. Report on the occurrence of a traffic accident;

arrow