logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2018.07.06 2017고단1089
업무상횡령
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,00, Defendant B and C, respectively, by a fine of KRW 500,000.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the head office of the victim D Agricultural Cooperatives E, from March 2008 to April 9, 2015, who was engaged in the management and supervision of the personnel of G ticket offices, H ticket offices, and I ticket offices. Defendant B is a person who was engaged in the duty of boarding tickets, the duty of guiding the employees of the G ticket offices, and the Defendant C from July 201 to November 2014. Defendant C is a person who was engaged in the duty of guiding the boarding tickets, the duty of guiding the F vehicle on board at the agricultural ticket office located in the Seoul Special Self-Governing Province located in his/her former J from August 201 to September 2017.

In the process of getting off and leaving off cars using F from G, the Defendants damaged the car by the inducement waterways of the staff, and when the passengers resist it, the Defendants arbitrarily refunded the passenger tickets to use them for compensation without notifying the victim union.

1. On August 1, 2014, Defendant A and B directed Defendant B to refund passenger tickets to the person working for the vehicle operator who was damaged by the vehicle from the vehicle operator who is a passenger at the G ticket office, and Defendant B accordingly entered the ticket number in the refund handling column of the ticket ticket system located in G ticket office, divided the refund pressing, and revoked the boarding ticket, and then delivered KRW 20,000 of the vehicle boarding car which was kept in cash by the passenger from the passenger to Defendant A, and then used KRW 4,640,000 in total by the above methods until November 30, 2014, including the fact that the vehicle operator was damaged by the vehicle operator at the passenger at the ticket office, and used the vehicle repair expense by November 30, 2014.

As a result, Defendant A and B embezzled the property of the victim union in collusion.

2. On August 4, 2014, Defendant A and C’s joint crime directed Defendant C to refund the passenger’s ticket to the person working for the passenger in the G ticket office, who was subject to a claim from the operator of LA who is a passenger to have damaged his/her motor vehicle, and Defendant C accordingly issued a ticket number in the ticket office to refund the ticket in the ticket office.

arrow