The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of the lower court (six months of imprisonment) on the gist of the grounds of appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment is based on the following facts: (a) the Defendant led to the confession and reflect of the instant crime; (b) the Defendant agreed with the victim H and the victim D in the trial at the original trial; (c) the Defendant did not enter the amount of the instant crime; (d) the Defendant was a majority of the criminal records of the same kind; and (e) the Defendant did not pay the amount agreed to be paid at the time of agreement with the victim I at the original trial but did not pay it to I properly; and (e) I want to be punished against the Defendant at the trial; and (e) comprehensively taking account of the circumstances leading up to the instant crime, method, circumstances after the commission of the instant crime, the Defendant’s age, career, sexual conduct, etc., and all the conditions indicated in the arguments and records, the sentence of

The defendant's argument of sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.