The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of the court below (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Even when considering the facts that the defendant led to the confession and reflect of each of the crimes of this case, and that there is no record of punishment more severe than the past, each of the crimes of this case is deemed to have been committed by the defendant, even though the defendant changed the lane on the bridge where the change of the lane is prohibited, and the victim has left without taking any measures, such as causing traffic accidents involving personal and material damage, such as getting the center of the vehicle and getting off by the victim due to the shocking of the vehicle on several occasions, and getting off without taking any measures, and the nature of the crime is not good. The degree of the victim's injury is not less than 4 weeks of medical treatment, and in particular, it is deemed that the victim was under considerable mental suffering from the accident of this case, and the victim did not reach an agreement with the victim until the court of first instance. Furthermore, even if the defendant applied for severe punishment against the defendant, it is difficult to view that the defendant has made efforts to recover from the crime by taking account of the circumstances that are favorable to the defendant's previous sentencing and punishment since it appears that the defendant had been completely committed.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit.