logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2016.05.10 2016고단304
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치사상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Power of crime] The defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1 million by the Seoul Western District Court on August 31, 2007 for a crime of violation of road traffic law (drinking driving), and on August 4, 2009, a summary order of KRW 1.5 million by the Seoul Western District Court for the same crime.

[Criminal facts]

1. Around 04:40 on December 25, 2015, the Defendant driven C in a state of under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 300 meters from the 21st road of Yongsan-gu Seoul, Yongsan-gu to the 21st road of Yongsan-gu, Seoul, Seoul, while under the influence of alcohol level of about 0.103%.

Accordingly, the Defendant, who violated the prohibition of drinking under the influence of alcohol not less than twice, was driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol in violation of the said provision.

2. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Death or injury caused before the risk) is a person who is engaged in driving of the last car in C.

Defendant 1 driven the said car while under the influence of alcohol level of 0.103% during the blood transfusion at the time of the above paragraph 1, and stopped on three-lanes in the direction of Hannam distance from the south of Yongsan-gu Seoul, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, in the direction of Hannam distance, but proceeded again at a speed that would not be known.

While the victim D(27) of the victim D(27) that was followed at the time was trying to enter from the three-lanes to the alley, the vehicle of the defendant was stopped in the front, and the vehicle of the defendant was not driven, but the vehicle of the defendant was not driven. Accordingly, the victim's vehicle entered the two-lanes, leading the vehicle of the defendant, leading the vehicle of the defendant, and passing another three-lane.

In such a case, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance, such as accurately manipulating and safely driving the steering gear, etc. of the vehicle, the driver of the vehicle, who is engaged in driving service.

Nevertheless, the defendant remains red on face.

arrow