A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Occupational embezzlement is similar to the victim C’s design.

Since around 2006, the above sentence C, as a matter of constructing a golf course on the land among the doors located in Jeonyang-gun D, became a dispute between the members of the literature, and there was a complaint and accusation among them, and in the process, several doors, including the defendant, were sentenced to a fine.

Accordingly, the defendant has taken a mind that he would pay his criminal case attorney fees and the fine of literature members with the same opinion as himself as his own property as his property.

The defendant, as a similar to the above C literature, was in charge of the above literature meeting, and was in charge of the overall management of property and the day of the literature.

On March 2, 2009, while the defendant kept his property in the above victim's door for business purposes, he embezzled 3.4 million won by consuming 3.4 million won as the attorney fee for the perjury case No. 2009Kadan8 by the Gwangju District Court for the defendant.

From this point to October 21, 201, the Defendant embezzled total of 8.9 million won on nine occasions, such as the list of crimes in the attached Form.

2. On February 2, 2009, the Defendant: (a) asked F to appear as a witness at the court in front of the F’s residence in Gwangju Mine-gu, Gwangju; and (b) asked F to “I to testify that I s/he was s/he was s/he at the house and s/he was s/he was s/he at the house on November 24, 2006, and s/he was s/he was s/he was s/he was s/he was s/he was

Defendant: (a) On November 24, 2006, the fact that F completed the literature-based general assembly on November 24, 2006, and did not have the Defendant; (b) on March 19, 2009, the Defendant was present at the court of Gwangju District Court No. 402, and taken an oath as a witness; and (c) on November 24, 2006, the Defendant instigated the Defendant to make a false testimony contrary to his memory to the purport that F was well aware of the fact that he was well aware of the fact at the three-distance center of the bridge distance from Yongsan-dong, Chungcheongnam-dong, Gwangju, and was taking an oath.

Summary of Evidence

1. The first time;