The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the original court’s imprisonment (three months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable;

2. The fact that the judgment defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflected in the crime is favorable to the defendant.

On the other hand, the defendant was sentenced to a fine of one million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act in 2016, a fine of 300,000 won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act in the same year, a fine of 200,000 won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act in 2018, and a violation of the Road Traffic Act in 2018 and a suspended sentence of 3 years for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving). In addition, even though the judgment of the suspended sentence became final and conclusive, the defendant did not know even though he was in the period of suspended sentence, and did not find any circumstances that the point of driving in this case is considerably away in the defendant's domicile, and that the distance of driving in this case is not short, and that there was no unavoidable reason to deem that a unauthorized

In addition, considering the defendant's age, character, conduct and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, the conditions of sentencing specified in the argument of this case, such as the circumstances after the crime, it is not recognized that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable. Thus, the above argument of the defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.