1. The part against the defendant in the judgment of the first instance shall be revoked;

2. The plaintiff's claim against the defendant is dismissed.

3...

1. The Plaintiff’s summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion is aware that the Defendant and C are operating “E”, which is a building company, and the Plaintiff completed the supply and installation of a cryprying house construction work (hereinafter “instant construction work”) at the site of the crypyp site where E is proceeding on the F, and was signed by the Defendant and C in the transaction specification of the said supply.

As such, the Defendant, together with the Plaintiff, entered into the instant goods contract with C, is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the price of KRW 8.3 million, including the instant Washington, along with C.

In addition, the defendant acted as the opposite contractual party, and the plaintiff was aware that the defendant and C were the opposite contractual party, and thus, considering these circumstances, the defendant is jointly and severally liable with C to pay the above price to the plaintiff.

2. Determination

A. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the statements and arguments stated in Gap evidence 1-2, Eul evidence 2-1, Eul evidence 4-1, and Eul evidence 4-1, the plaintiff is recognized as having entered the defendant's name in the E-mail (hereinafter "E-mail") delivered by the defendant to the plaintiff on June 5, 2013.

B. However, in full view of the overall purport of the arguments stated in the evidence Nos. 1-1, 2, 2-1, 2-2, 1, 2-2, 3-1, 2, 4-1, 2, 3, and 6-1, 4-1, 4-1, 2, 3, and 6-2, G shall enter into a contract for construction with C as to the instant construction project.