The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the sentence (700,000 won in penalty, 700,000 won in penalty) declared by the court below is too unfasible and unreasonable.

2. The Defendant did not pay wages and retirement allowances to his/her employees, and the payment of wages and retirement allowances is a key factor that guarantees the basic life of the employees, and thus, it is disadvantageous to the Defendant.

However, the decision in lieu of paying the amount of KRW 5,00,00 to the defendant in the lawsuit of damages in Busan District Court 2015Da15176 decided that the defendant led to the confession of the crime in this case, the first offender, the defendant's employee's larceny in the restaurant operated by the defendant, and the defendant's employee was issued a summary order of KRW 3,00,000,000, and the decision in lieu of paying the amount of KRW 5,000 to the defendant in the lawsuit of damages in Busan District Court 2015Da102378 was made. In light of the circumstances, there are other circumstances that can be considered in light of these circumstances, and other various circumstances that are the conditions for sentencing as indicated in the records and the theory of changes, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, family relationship, means and result after the crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the court below cannot be deemed unfair because it is too unfforher

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit.