A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On May 31, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 22:50 on May 31, 2013, the Defendant: (b) on the ground that the father and the house of Gyeyang-gu Incheon apartment 104, which had a flat appraisal at the street, were disputed and brought about; (c) on the grounds of the separate removal of waste from the front office of 104, the Defendant: (a) destroyed the victim’s circulp pipe (1m, 2cm in thickness) with a circulp pipe for repairing 86,00 won; (b) destroyed the victim’s circulp 20,000 won to repair circulp 9; (c) destroyed the victim’s circulp 20,000 won to repair culp 90,000 won to repair culp 20,0000 won to repair culp 30,000,000

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement of D, F, H, J, L, N, P, R, and T;

1. Written estimate;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing suspect-use pipe photographs;

1. Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime concerned, Article 366 of the Criminal Act;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. The fact that all the victims of reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act do not want the punishment of the defendant, the defendant is in depth against the crime, and the same criminal records are used.