A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Punishment of the crime

On July 24, 2017, the Defendant: (a) at the F Office operated by the Victim E in Jung-gu, Jung-gu, Jung-gu, Jung-gu, the Defendant: (b) cut off the gap outside of the lock-si office in order to communicate with G with the Defendant by the injured party; (c) on the books of the other office, the victim-owned market price of KRW 18.75g, the amount of KRW 2.3 million at the market price of KRW 2.5g and KRW 2.3 million at the market price of KRW 22.5g and KRW 8 million at the market price of KRW 1,000,000 at the right side of the book.

Summary of Evidence

1. The application of statutes to the defendant's legal statement E, the police seizure protocol and list of seizure, investigation report (related to capturing CCTV image data at the scene of the crime), investigation report (related to attaching photographs of the damaged storage place), investigation report (related to the suspect and accompanying person G), investigation report (related to the investigation of the damaged storage place), investigation report (related to the victim E statement recording and CD attachment report), investigation report (report on the victim's telephone recording and telephone call report), investigation report (related to telephone call report

1. Scope of applicable provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 329 of the Criminal Act, grounds for sentencing of sentence of imprisonment with prison labor and one legal penalty: One month to six years;

2. The scope of the recommended punishment on the sentencing criteria [the scope of the recommended punishment] [the scope of the punishment] for the larceny of general property, and the area of mitigation [the scope of the recommended punishment] of the same repeated crime (the area of recommendation] that does not fall under the category two (the person subject to special sentencing] of the punishment, and the aggravation of the specific crime (the aggravated offense) [the scope of the recommendation] to 4 months or ten months; and

3. The fact that the defendant's decision on the sentence of punishment of this case recognizes the criminal facts of this case, the defendant seems to have a trouble in shocking the impulse, and the defendant is judged to have committed the crime of this case in a somewhat contingent and contingent manner, and the defendant seems to have committed the same kind of crime without participating in a dynamic tool even though he is deemed to have a normal social life while operating the company and have a ties between his family members.