1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Facts of premise;

A. A. Around July 2014, the Plaintiff and the Defendants, the married couple, prepared the parts necessary for the Defendants’ business start-up, and the Defendants concluded a contract with the terms that the Plaintiff used Mat’s Mat’s Mat’s Mat’s Mat’s Mat’s Mat’s Mat’s Mat’s Mat’s Mat’s Mat’s Mat’s Mat’s Mat’s Mat Mat’s Ma

B. On October 31, 2014, the Defendants commenced business with the trade name “D” (hereinafter “the instant marina”), and the Plaintiff operated the static Corner while taking charge of the occupation of the instant marina.

C. On December 10, 2014, the Plaintiff delivered Maccop to the Defendants.

[Ground of recognition] A without dispute, entry of evidence No. 1, purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. (1) At the time of the contract of this case, the Defendants, instead of paying the Plaintiff the price of KRW 30 million for Mat Start-up consulting, agreed to use the instant Matppp for three years. The Defendants, when transferring the instant Mt to another or demanding the Plaintiff to leave Matppp, agreed to pay the Plaintiff the equivalent price.

(2) The Plaintiff completed consulting services for the opening of the instant marina business, including a lease agreement on the instant marina site, construction of a new building, installation of internal facilities, purchase of facilities and transportation, and consultation with the delivery customer. Around two weeks from the first day of the instant business to attract the customers of Macoer, the Plaintiff invested KRW 4 million for two weeks from the first day of the business.

(3) However, on December 9, 2014, the Defendants demanded the Plaintiff to leave the Mat and Macop to the Plaintiff, and from December 10, 2014, the Defendants directly operate the Mat and Macop.

(4) Therefore, the Defendants primarily violated the agreement that allows the Plaintiff to use the static Corner for three years, thereby resulting in the Plaintiff’s static Corner.