logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.01.11 2017나51158
구상금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is an insurer entrusted with the business of guaranteeing motor vehicle accident compensation by the Minister of Land, Infrastructure and Transport in accordance with the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, and an insurer that entered into an automobile insurance contract with respect to the B-owned C motor vehicles (hereinafter “Plaintiffs”).

B. On March 21, 2015, at around 23:50, the Defendant operated a two-wheeled vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) and proceeded in violation of the road signal in front of the restaurant in Bupyeong-gu Incheon, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, and shocked B of the crosswalkd in the front section.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). C.

B A due to the instant accident, the Plaintiff suffered injury, such as a thring of the left-hand bed of abandonment, brain-proof sugar, spawn of spawn of spawn, etc., and the Plaintiff suffered injury from his medical expenses and agreed fees, etc., from June 3, 2015 to B.

8. From June 5, 2015 to October 7, 2015, 16,270 won was paid as 10,30,000 won as a government security business, and (2) from June 5, 2015 to October 7, 2015, according to a special contract for coverage by an insured automobile under an insurance contract, 16,270 won was returned as 8,116,920 won was returned from another liability insurance company, which is another liability insurer, from September 25, 2015.

The Defendant was indicted as a violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents due to the instant accident by Incheon District Court 2015 Godan2567, and was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year from the above court in May 27, 2015, and appealed by Incheon District Court 2015No3252, and was sentenced to a fine of 7 million won from the above court on March 23, 2016, and the said judgment became final and conclusive around that time.

(hereinafter referred to as "relevant criminal case"). [Ground of recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, each entry of Gap evidence 1 through 14 (including paper numbers), and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. (1) The occurrence and scope of the liability for damages occurs.

arrow