logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2018.04.18 2017나1440
공사대금
Text

1. Of the parts concerning the counterclaim against the judgment of the court of first instance, the money which orders the payment below.

Reasons

1. The principal lawsuit and counterclaim shall also be deemed to exist;

A. On June 11, 2012, a partnership construction company (hereinafter “partnership construction”) concluded a construction contract (hereinafter “instant construction contract”) with respect to the extension project for the purpose of Amiddle School Multi-Purpose Party (hereinafter “instant construction project”) ordered by the Plaintiff and Seoul Southern District Office of Education (hereinafter “Contracting Authority”).

Contract amount: From June 11, 2012 to June 11, 2012, the contract amount of KRW 975,500,000 (excluding value-added tax, safety management expenses based on actual cost settlement of KRW 15,000: 1) shall be six items (six items) from the supply value to the supply value.

84.65 per cent of the deducted amount. - In the event of a modified contract, the Plaintiff shall carry out the construction with the authority of the entire project awarded and responsible for the defects arising from the defect repair period after the completion of the construction, and shall submit to the Extraordinary Construction, a warranty bond for the subcontracted portion and a warranty for the performance of the defects for which the joint and several sureties for the entire project have been appointed.

4) The costs to be borne by the Plaintiff are as follows: - Materials cost required for the Corporation - personnel cost required for the Corporation - all expenses incurred for the Corporation - Resident tax for workers Gap, resident tax - field agent, safety manager, quality manager (all the expenses incurred for the Corporation - all the expenses incurred until completion and rental expenses all all the expenses incurred for the Corporation

B. After that, the value of supply to the contracting authority was changed from KRW 1,176,417,728 to KRW 1,208,260,364, and the construction cost of this case, excluding the safety management expenses, was finally changed to KRW 973,447,548 (excluding value-added tax). An amount including value-added tax, including value-added tax, is 1,070,792.

arrow