Defendant

A A Fine of 5,00,000 won, Defendant B of 5,000,000 won, Defendant C of 5,000,000 won, and Defendant C of 5,00,00 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. On March 2014, the Defendant met the victim M, which is the complaint in L construction site located in G in the same group, at the J restaurant located in Gyeongbuk-gun I, and the Defendant was frighted to the effect that “B is a reporter in the same group, and there are many local reporters in nutrition, and the office expenses will not be used as articles, and the office expenses will not be extracted both at the site and annoyingly.”

After April 1, 2014, the reporter of a nutrition area reported an article that points out environmental problems in the construction site, and as a result, the victim is likely to report additional articles about the construction site. On June 2014, the Defendant called the victim again to make a phone call to the victim and put the victim fright to prepare money.

On June 30, 2014, the Defendant received 1.5 million won in cash from the Defendant’s office located in the PP around June 30, 2014.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by threatening the victim.

B. The Defendant: (a) on August 201, 201, and (b) on June 1, 201

As described in the subsection, the Defendant called “N’s creative commemorative event,” and did not pay money to the victims M who are frightening to use a critical article about the construction site, the Defendant frighted to use it as if he used a critical article about the construction site.”

On September 2014, the Defendant received KRW 1 million in cash from the victim of drinking fright, in the vicinity of the Cheong-do Office in front of the Cheong-do Office.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by threatening the victim.

2. Defendant B

A. On May 2014, the Defendant: (a) reported a critical article about the construction site as above; and (b) carried the victim M, who was subject to intimidation from reporters A et al., was frighted by phone calls; (c) had the victim refused to communicate several times, and (d) had the victim contacted several times; and (e) on July 2014, the Defendant was a policeman.