A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On April 19, 2017, the Defendant: (a) visited C District on the ground that he did not pay a card to purchase plastic paper at a “D” convenience store located in the Busan High Police Station located in Busan High-gu, Busan High-gu B; (b) visited C District on the ground that he did not pay the card; and (c) accompanied E and the convenience store belonging to the Busan High-gu Police Station, who is working in the situation of C District, by accompanying E and the convenience store, the Defendant would not pay the card of 100 won from E.

10 won was 100 won.

After that, on April 19, 2017, the Defendant: (a) carried a fluorial fluoring cans with empty beer according to the above C, and (b) took a bath for disregarding himself/herself on the ground that he/she neglected to work in the earth, and (c) took a fluorial fluoring fluoring cans containing the above empty beer, and (d) took a fluorial fluoring fluoring with the hand, and (e) took a fluorial fluoring fluoring E with the hand of the Defendant’s action, and (e) took a assault, such as taking the fluoring E’s chest on his/her hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to global guard service.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reports (Interference with the performance of official duties), ctv video closure photographs;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act and Article 136 of the Criminal Act (1) and the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution does not only assault a police officer in the course of performing official duties, but also refuses to affix a written confirmation and a written confirmation of arrest after arresting a flagrant offender, and the circumstances after committing the crime, such as paying time expenses, are not good. On February 21, 2013, there was a record of being sentenced to a fine of KRW 3 million by obstructing the performance of official duties. However, there was no past record of punishment, and there is no depth of the crime, and police officer E reflects the Defendant’s seat.