1. The Defendant’s disposition of restriction on participation in national research and development projects for six months against the Plaintiff on October 10, 2014 and research costs.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff is a professor of biotechnology in the public university of B University. The Defendant is a legal entity established pursuant to the Research Foundation of Korea Act, which is a public institution designated as an entrusted enforcement-type quasi-governmental institution pursuant to Article 5(1) and (3) of the Act on the Management of Public Institutions.

B. 1) The former Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (as of March 23, 2013, the pertinent affairs of the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning are succeeded to) and the Defendant’s “C” on March 14, 2013 (hereinafter “instant tasks C”)

(2) On April 18, 2013, the Plaintiff publicly announced the recruitment of researchers to be supported, and the Plaintiff applied for participation in the instant bio-related task as the subject of “D” as a person in charge of research on April 18, 2013. (2) The Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning and the Defendant published the recruitment of researchers to be supported by “E” (hereinafter “instant bio-related task”) on May 9, 2013, and the Plaintiff applied for participation in the instant bio-related task as the subject of “G” in the position of a person in charge of research, along with the F professor affiliated with Korea University on May 2013.

C. On July 24, 2013, the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning selected and publicly announced “G” that the Plaintiff applied with F professors as a new task for the instant bio-related tasks. On August 20, 2013, the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning selected and publicly announced “D” as a new task for the instant bio-related tasks.

Accordingly, from August 1, 2013, the Plaintiff started research and development of the instant bio-related task, and started research and development of the instant C task from September 1, 2013.

E. On April 30, 2014, the Defendant confirmed that the Plaintiff was a person in charge of the national research and development project and was newly selected as a person in charge of the research and development project in the instant case, even though the Plaintiff was performing three tasks [1] under the supervision of the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, 2. 3.

Accordingly, the defendant is the three books so-called "the plaintiff can participate in a maximum of five research and development tasks, and among which three research and development tasks may be conducted as a responsible researcher."