logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2016.10.07 2016가단121533
보증채무금
Text

1. The Defendant shall pay to the Intervenor succeeding to the Plaintiff KRW 21,363,567 as well as KRW 21,010,121 as to the Intervenor succeeding to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Determination as to the claim of the Plaintiff’s succeeding intervenor

(a)in addition to the description of the claim and the reasons for participation;

(However, the creditor, "the plaintiff" and "the debtor" are deemed "the defendant"). (b)

Judgment by service based on recognition (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act)

2. According to the overall purport of evidence Nos. 4, 5, and 6 as to the Plaintiff’s claim, the Plaintiff may recognize the fact that the Plaintiff transferred the above loan claim against the Defendant to the Intervenor succeeding to the Plaintiff on May 20, 2016, while the lawsuit in this case was pending. Thus, the Plaintiff’s claim is without merit.

3. As such, the plaintiff's claim by the succeeding intervenor is justified, and the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow