logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2018.06.27 2017가단55320
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. As to Defendant B’s forest land D, Youngnam-do, Youngnam-do, 47207 square meters:

B. Defendant C shall be Jeonnamdo.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The Plaintiff entered into a sales contract with other investors, jointly with the other investors, shall be 47207 square meters of land D, Youngnam-gun, Youngnam-do (hereinafter “instant real estate 1”).

(C) The Defendant, the spouse of the Defendant C, is the 979mm2, Jeonnam-gun, Youngnam-gun, the Doz. (hereinafter “2 real estate of this case”). The real estate of this case 1 and 2 is the “each of the instant real estate” in total.

(2) On April 11, 2006, the Plaintiff and the Defendants concluded a sales contract with respect to each of the instant real estate as KRW 290 million and agreed to designate the buyer as “A and 10 persons,” and the buyer agreed to pay the remainder of KRW 70 million on the date of the contract, and the remainder of KRW 220 million on June 20, 2006.

(hereinafter “instant sales contract”). B.

(1) On April 7, 2006, prior to the date of entering into the instant contract, the Plaintiff had Nonparty F transfer KRW 20 million out of the down payment under the instant contract to the Defendant B’s account. On April 11, 2006, prior to the date of entering into the instant contract, the Plaintiff directly paid the remainder of KRW 50 million to the Defendants on June 16, 2006. (2) The Plaintiff paid the Defendants the remainder of KRW 220 million to the Defendants by June 16, 2006 (the sum of KRW 60 million was transferred to the Defendant B account by Nonparty G on May 11, 2006).

[Ground for Recognition: Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1-3, Gap evidence 6 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply)

(2) Each entry and the purport of the whole pleading

2. Determination:

A. The plaintiff asserted that although F or G bears part of the purchase price of this case, it is only an internal monetary relationship with the plaintiff, and the parties to the sales contract of this case are only the plaintiff, the defendants are liable to implement the procedure for ownership transfer registration for each real estate of this case in accordance with the sales contract of this case.

2.3.

arrow