The punishment of the accused shall be determined by eight months of imprisonment.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant is not a narcotics handler.

1. On September 15, 2016, the Defendant: (a) opened a 2,500 chlogram (the currency unit of the Philippines) with the payment of the Metetop clogram (the Metopphone; hereinafter referred to as “Metophone”) from the employees of the Republic of Korea, on which it is impossible to identify the trade name located in the area of the Metopha of the Philippines; (b) around September 15, 2016, the Defendant laid down the Metop phone in the form of 2,50 chlograms (the degree of 2-3 known of the size of the Metophone) with the Metopphone’s Metophy in which it is impossible to identify the trade name in the Metop area; and (c) administered the Metop in a way that approximately 3-4 me as soon as possible.

2. On October 2016, the Defendant: (a) purchased 2,500 opulon price from the said employee to the female female employee of the Philippines, whose name is unknown at a drinking house in which it is impossible to identify the trade name located in the area of Mean-si, Mean; (b) received opulon price from the said employee, and administered opulon in the same manner as paragraph (1).

3. On November 2016, the Defendant: (a) taken the 2,500 philopon price to the employees of the Switzerland women’s drinking house with which it is impossible to know the name of the trade name located in the area of the said Melopon in order to know the name of the Melopon; (b) received from the said employees the Melopon volume of the Melopon (the degree of 2 to 3 known from the Melopon of the rice size) and administered the Melopon in the manner as described in the foregoing paragraph (1).

4. On January 2017, the Defendant: (a) purchased 2,500 philophones from the employees of the Philippines with no knowledge of the trade name located in the area of detached from the said employees; (b) received philophones from the said employees (the degree of 2 to 3 known of the size of rice eggs) and administered philophones in the same manner as the above 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The response to the request for appraisal, the narcotics appraisal report;