Defendant shall be punished by a fine of eight million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On May 24, 2016, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 20:53 on May 24, 2016, and continued two lanes adjacent to the apartment in the middle of the Sinju-si in the Gu of Cheongju-si, using a large distance of Masan-distance.

At the time, night and its limit is 80 km every hour, so the defendant engaged in driving of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely operate the motor vehicle by complying with the restricted speed and thoroughly driving the motor vehicle at the front time.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to drive a restricted speed exceeding 38 km per hour and did not discover the victim E (68 cm) who was on the two-lanes, and did not have the victim E (68 cm) and shocked the victim on the right side of the above vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the death of the victim in his/her job by occupational negligence as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A traffic accident report (1) (2) (2) and on-site photographs;

1. A death certificate;

1. Sending a traffic accident analysis report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of CD 1 CDs (on-site photographs, vehicles boomers, etc.);

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the Selection of Punishment, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is very important in the result of the crime committed on the grounds of the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act; the victim’s bereaved family members do not want the punishment of the defendant; the victim’s bereaved family members do not want the punishment by mutual consent with the victim’s bereaved family members; the victim’s comprehensive motor vehicle insurance policy; the victim was negligent in the occurrence of an accident; the victim has been sentenced to the same kind of fine and one time before and after the occurrence of the accident; the defendant’