Text
Defendant
A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,00,000, and by imprisonment of Defendant B, for six months.
Defendant
A does not pay the above fine.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On December 10, 2015, Defendant A, at a “G” restaurant store located in Changwon-si F around 20:30 on December 10, 2015, whether he/she is well operating in the victim B (37 years).
the statement to the effect that it is, “I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am.”
In hearing the word "," the victim was injured by breath’s breath and breath’s bat, and upon drinking the victim’s face, the victim was injured by approximately three weeks of batum dump, tension, etc.
2. Defendant B, at the above date and time and place, and at the above time and place, the victim A (43 Dose) suffered bodily injury, such as cage dyke fry, etc., where the victim was fryed from the victim who was faced with drinking face by drinking, and frying the victim’s left side by drinking the victim’s hand, and frying it over the floor, and frying the victim’s crym., which requires approximately 8 weeks medical treatment.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. Each police statement made against the Defendants and H
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each injury diagnosis letter;
1. Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257(1) of the same Act concerning criminal facts, and Article 257(1) of the same Act, and Article 257 of the
1. Defendant A who is detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;
1. Defendant B: Defendant B, on the grounds of the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Code, [the scope of the recommended sentence] general injury [the scope of the recommended sentence], where the victim is fully responsible for the occurrence of a crime or the expansion of damage (including a serious effort to recover damage)] in the case where the victim is also responsible for the occurrence of a crime or for the expansion of damage, or where the damage was restored to a considerable portion of damage (the decision of sentence] in the case of Defendant A, the victim agreed with the victim, and the victim was relatively minor, and there was no other criminal history other than the four-time fine, and the victim was agreed with the victim in the case of Defendant B, and there was only two-time fine and one-time suspended sentence.