1. The Defendant against Plaintiff A, KRW 123,789,43, KRW 700,00 for Plaintiff B, and KRW 200,00 for Plaintiff C and each of the said money.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. D, while under the influence of alcohol at around 01:40 on April 10, 2015, while driving an EK5 vehicle (hereinafter “a hazard vehicle”) under the influence of alcohol at a 0.106% of alcohol content, D driving the 14th line road at a speed of 70 km per hour at a speed of 14 km away from the string of the string seat at the string seat at the string seat of the string, while driving the 2nd line road at a speed of 70 km at the speed of the string seat at the string seat at the string seat at the string seat of the string, Plaintiff A was faced with the front string part of the string part of the XG vehicle operated by Plaintiff A, and suffered injury, such

B. Plaintiff B is the wife of Plaintiff A, and Plaintiff C is the child, and the Defendant is an insurance company that entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract with respect to a melting vehicle.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3 and 9, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above recognition of the liability for damages, the accident in this case occurred due to a mistake in driving a harming vehicle while under the influence of alcohol by D, the driver of the harming vehicle, so the defendant, the insurer of the harming vehicle, is liable to compensate the damages suffered by the plaintiffs.

3. Except as otherwise stated below within the scope of liability for damages, each corresponding item of the attached Table 1 of the calculation of damages.

In principle, the period for the convenience of calculation shall be calculated on a monthly basis, but less than the last month and less than won shall be discarded). The current price calculation at the time of the accident of the amount of damages shall be governed by the simple interest reduction method that deducts the interim interest at the rate of 5/12 per month.

In addition, it is rejected that the parties' arguments are not stated separately.

[Ground of recognition] The evidence as mentioned above, Gap evidence Nos. 5 through 8, Eul evidence Nos. 2 and 3, each of the evidence No. 2 and 3, each of the physical evaluation commissioned to Busan Masan Hospital annexed to the human rights university of this Court, and the fact inquiry results, and the fact inquiry results of this court's fact inquiry about Green LLC Co., Ltd., and the purport of the whole pleadings

A. 1) The end date of operation of the daily operating facility 2) G G G living: the end date of operation: July 2030, when the age of 60 is reached.