1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

Purport of claim and appeal

1.

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows. The plaintiff continued to proceed with the procedure in accordance with the order to commence the auction procedure before and after the second order to commence the auction procedure," which is the last second order of the judgment of the court of first instance, and in such a case, if he acquired a lien after the effect of the seizure upon the order to commence the second order to commence the auction procedure, he cannot set up against the purchaser of the above auction procedure. As seen above, the defendant C entered into a contract after October 9, 2012, where the seizure registration upon the order to commence the second order to commence the auction procedure was completed after the completion of the seizure registration upon the order to commence the second order to commence the auction procedure ( even if the establishment registration on the forest of this case in the name of P which was the basis for the decision to commence the second order to commence the auction procedure was cancelled before the sale date of the above auction procedure, and there is no evidence to view that the plaintiff paid the sale price in the above auction procedure after the second order to the court below for the second order to 919 days of second order.

2. As the above defendant C entered into a contract with the non-party church, it is possible to oppose the plaintiff with the right of retention.