logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.08.22 2016가단5087950
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant C (Attached 2) on June 1, 2018 with respect to each portion of 1/18 of the real estate listed in the real estate list.

Reasons

Basic Facts

[Attachment 2] Each real estate listed in the real estate list (hereinafter “each real estate of this case”) is a land divided into two hundred and forty-eight square meters (hereinafter “land before subdivision”) on April 28, 1982. The land before subdivision was registered for preservation of ownership in the F on April 1, 1937, and the ownership was transferred to G on the same day on the same day pursuant to the Act on Special Measures for the Registration, etc. of Ownership of Real Estate (Act No. 3094) on February 29, 1980. The ownership transfer registration was completed on November 6, 1966.

H Dec. 6, 1994, died on July 6, 1994, there are 14 persons both the Defendant (Appointed Party) and the designated parties, and Defendant C, D.

[Reasons] No dispute exists over the plaintiff's ground for recognition. 1, 12 through 15, 21 through 23 each entry of Gap's evidence (including the number number; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the entire pleadings, and the plaintiff's claim against the defendant (appointed party) and the appointed party (hereinafter "party B, etc.") as to the decision on the claim against the plaintiff's defense of safety, the plaintiff asserted for the implementation of the procedure for the registration of transfer of ownership based on the termination of the title trust of the plaintiff's real estate of this case for the reason that each of the real estate of this case is based on the title trust of the plaintiff's own, and 12 of the defendant (appointed party B, etc.) are not in existence, and there is no resolution of the general meeting for the filing of the lawsuit of this case, and therefore, the lawsuit

Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in the statement of Gap's evidence 6 through 9, the plaintiff clan was naturally formed for the purpose of the protection of the graves of the 13-year old members of the 13th group, their religious services, and their descendants, with the rules of the clan, elected its representative, owned the real estate of the clan, and resolved on the institution of the lawsuit of this case at the clan meeting held on April 4, 2015.

arrow