The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the reasons for appeal (two years of imprisonment, confiscation) by the lower court is too unreasonable;

2. Although the Defendant recognized the facts of the crime, the Defendant committed violence against the victims with a knife, etc., causing serious injury to the victims. When the victims report to the police at the time of the crime, the victims were reported to the mobile phone at the time of the crime, the electric breaker was set off in order to avoid tracking location. The police officer called out and tried to conceal or reduce the crime by having the victim F and the victims G with large amounts of blood transfusion enter the door with the clothes without a blood trace, and throw away the blood scambing on the floor, and not opening the door, etc., the victims seem to have suffered considerable mental shock due to the crime of this case. The victims did not recover from the victims' damage, rather than the crime of this case, in light of all the sentencing conditions stated in the records of this case such as the age, character and conduct of the victims, and circumstances after the crime of this case, it cannot be deemed unfair to sentence the Defendant against the crime of this case.

3. If so, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.