Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 8, 2017, around 19:40, the Defendant committed an indecent act by force against the victim E (the 24 years old) who talks with the employee before the catter in the “D” coffee shop located in Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon, by reporting the victim E (the 24 years old) and committing an indecent act against the victim by using the victim’s own left hand in writing and rhying part on the victim’s left side side.

2. Whether the Defendant interfered with the business was humping to the victim F (e.g., 21 years of age) who is an employee of the coffee shop at the same time and at the same place as paragraph 1.

It is reasonable to see whether the waste can be laid on the floor, whether the waste can be laid on the wall, whether the coffee, which was laid on the table, was laid on the wall, intending to put the chair, and approximately 15 minutes after coming out of it, and again returned to the coffee shop, and the victim "the spawn and the inside of it was sexually indecent."

The president made a disturbance, such as Bara, CCTV Bara, and Baging down, out of the outside, thereby obstructing the victim's coffee business by force for about 20 minutes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F and E;

1. 112 Notification to a department related to the report of the case;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Relevant Article 298 of the Criminal Act, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 16 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Committed to Order;

1. Although the reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, despite the fact that the defendant had been punished several times due to his previous obstruction of business prior to the sentencing, the crime of this case is not good, but there is a smooth agreement with the victims, and the defendant is sexually related to the defendant.