logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2018.12.06 2018고단1811
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 28, 2018, the Defendant driven a B rocketing car at around 19:26, and proceeded from the clock to C in the direction of the visual tower, as the Cheongju-gu resignation.

Since the above shooting distance is a place where traffic is controlled by signal, the defendant was responsible for the duty of care to properly handle the steering left and left well, and to proceed with the steering and steering system in a safe manner according to good faith.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and negligently proceeded with the part above the part above the victim D (22 ) E-to-face driving driven by the victim D (22 ) driving in accordance with the signals from the right-hand edge distance towards the left-hand edge of the direction of the Defendant’s course by the negligence of proceeding in violation of the signals.

Defendant 1 suffered injury to the victim, such as a franchis, which requires approximately 10 weeks of treatment due to such occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A de facto survey report (including CCTV images attached thereto);

1. Investigation report (No. 19 No. 19 of evidence records);

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing accident scene photographs;

1. Article 3(1) and the proviso to Article 3(2)1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines concerning criminal facts;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. In full view of all the favorable circumstances, including the fact that the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is recognized as the crime of provisional payment order and the fact that the sentence is erroneously divided, the first offender, the vehicle is covered by the comprehensive motor vehicle insurance, and the victim has agreed with the victim, etc., the defendant's age, sexual conduct, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and all other favorable circumstances, including the circumstances after the crime, etc., and the sentencing conditions specified in the records and the changed theories, the sentence is determined as ordered.

arrow