(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2015.05.29 2015고단360

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2015.05.29 2015고단360

공무집행방해

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 5, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 8 months for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Daegu District Court on February 5, 2015, and the judgment became final and conclusive on February 13, 2015.

On March 1, 2015, at around 23:10, the Defendant: (a) reported from the Defendant’s wife of the Daegu-gu Office to the effect that “the Defendant would have been able to know the Defendant because he was extremely interested; (b) the police officer of the Daegu-gu Police Station C Zone C was called up and called up by the Defendant; and (c) obstructed the Defendant’s lawful performance of duties concerning the maintenance of public order and security of the police officer for about 20 minutes, such as: (a) the defect in the patrol vehicle after the Defendant tolded the Defendant; (b) the front of the vehicle; (c) the vehicle was cut off by hand; (d) the police officer’s shoulder; and (d) the police officer’s shoulder was pushed up to the face of the said police officer; and (e) the police officer’s b3:10 minutes in drinking.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police statement law to D;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Selection of Punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act does not know even though the defendant for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the provisional payment order was under suspension of execution, and is not less than the nature of the crime in this case, but only the confession and reflect of the crime, the period of suspension of execution due to the crime in this case, the absence of the same kind of power, and the absence of the direct exercise of force

참조조문

유사 판례

-수원지방법원 평택지원 2015.10.22 2015고단1159

-대구지방법원 서부지원 2015.09.10 2015고단1201

-대구지방법원 서부지원 2015.09.24 2015고단1219

-대구지방법원 서부지원 2015.11.06 2015고단1414

-인천지방법원 2020.11.18 2020고단4807