1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The attached building is a multi-family house owned by the Plaintiff and constructed to enable all nine households to reside therein.

B. From October 15, 2009 to October 14, 2012, the Plaintiff: (a) delegated the Plaintiff with all affairs pertaining to the lease of the building indicated in the attached sheet, the management of the building, and the management of the building; and (b) entered into a contract on the continuous management of the building with H with the content that H leased the said building and pays KRW 500,000 per month to the Plaintiff out of its profits.

C. The Defendants: (a) upon receipt of a letter of delegation management agreement, power of attorney, etc. prepared in the name of the Plaintiff from H, respectively, as the Plaintiff’s agent; and (b) enter into a lease agreement as to the part of the attached building; and (c) possess it in delivery; and (d) the specific contents of the lease agreement are as follows (the respective descriptions of each leased object are the same as the part

The fact that the deposit for the leased portion on the date of the Defendant contract is KRW 15 million in the part of the deposit for the land (A) on February 19, 2013 and KRW 95 million in the part of the deposit for the land (a) on March 19, 2013 and KRW 100 million in the part of the 15 million D/D on September 1, 2012 and KRW 100 million in the part of the 16th floor (b) on April 16, 2013 and KRW 180 million in the part of the 180 million in the 195th floor on November 14, 2012 and KRW 95 million in the part of the 2nd floor on October 18, 2012 [based on recognition], there is no dispute over the evidence under subparagraphs 1 through 3, 1 through 7, 1-A, and 1 through 5-6 of the evidence under subparagraphs 1 and 5.

2. As seen earlier, the Plaintiff is the owner of the building indicated in the separate sheet, and the Defendants possessed each part of the claim stated in the separate sheet among the buildings indicated in the separate sheet. Therefore, insofar as the Defendants did not assert and prove the source of possessory right, they are obligated to deliver each part of their possession to the Plaintiff.

3. Determination as to the defendants' defense as to representation of right

A. The summary of the assertion lies in the right to possess each part of the building, since the Defendants entered into a lease agreement lawfully with H, the Plaintiff’s agent.