logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전고등법원 2017.06.30 2016나15974
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal and the additional selective claims filed by this court are all dismissed.

2. After an appeal is filed.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: (a) the separate list of Forms 12 and 14 of Part II of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be placed in “attached Form 2”; and (b) the supplementary claims added by the plaintiff in this court shall be cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except for the addition of the following Paragraph 2 with respect to selective claims added by the plaintiff in this court.

2. Determination as to the selective claims added in the trial

A. The plaintiff's assertion 1) The plaintiff negotiation with the defendants for the purpose of concluding a basic contract for the service entrusted by the Geum River Industries to the defendants, such as the cleaning of the AL pumps, which is entrusted by the defendants to the defendants. ① The waiver of the basic contract for the service in question and the suspension of transaction with other transaction partners, ② the restriction on the use and profit of the existing factory in this case and the number of interference with the business during the construction period of the new construction of the new factory in this case; ③ the comprehensive transfer of the plaintiff's physical facilities and authorization pursuant to the transfer agreement in this case; ④ the business losses incurred before the conclusion of the basic contract with the defendants; ④ the defendants suffered losses due to the execution of the service in the low price before the conclusion of the basic contract in this case. However, the defendants are jointly and severally liable to pay the plaintiff an amount equivalent to the expenses paid by one of the plaintiff to the plaintiff for the negotiation or the execution of the contract in this case without reasonable grounds.

arrow