1. The lawsuit of this case shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of retrial shall be borne by the defendant;

purport, purport, and.

1. On July 28, 2009, the final judgment subject to a retrial was rendered by the Plaintiff on July 28, 2009, as the name “BJ”, “BJK”, the address of Defendant C, and the place of service “YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY.

2. Although I, in the summary of his argument among the Defendants, stated in the complaint of the judgment subject to a retrial as a representative of the Defendant among the Defendants, was not the representative of the Defendant Heavy, among the Plaintiff, I was named as the representative of the Defendant Heavy and presented the complaint to the complaint of the judgment subject to a retrial while I did not submit a reply even after I received a copy of the complaint, etc., there is a ground for retrial as stipulated in Article 451(1)3 of the Civil Procedure Act.

3. Determination on the legitimacy of the litigation for retrial of this case

A. The main point of the parties’ assertion is that M is not the representative of the defendant's subordinate, and that the defendant's subordinate does not undergo the resolution of the general meeting of the defendant's subordinate in the filing of the instant suit for retrial, and thus, the instant lawsuit for retrial is unlawful.

In regard to this, the rules of the defendant in the defendant in the defendant in the defendant's race provide that the chairperson of the defendant in the defendant's race may exercise all his powers over the defendant in the defendant's race.