1. Defendant Greenland Co., Ltd.: (a) KRW 160,000,000 for the Plaintiff and its related amount from February 26, 2010 to April 29, 2016.

1. Basic facts

A. Defendant Greenland Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Greenland”) is a joint executor who newly built and sold two, five hundred and seventy-six households of “C apartment” (hereinafter “instant apartment”) and twenty-five households of three and twenty-five commercial buildings (hereinafter “instant commercial buildings”) on the ground of Cheongju-si Inter-si Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “dusan Construction”) and Cheongju-si B.

B. The apartment and commercial buildings of this case were completed on July 2009. At that time, the defendant's Moningland agreed to have two mountain construction and the apartment buildings of this case, and the defendant's Moningland respectively.

Accordingly, on September 17, 2009, 200 shares of 40/10 on the commercial building of this case were transferred to the Defendant Greenland, but 60/100 shares on the apartment of this case were not transferred to the account due to tax payment due to the registration tax, etc., but some shares of the apartment of this case remains in the assets of the Defendant Greenland.

C. On September 23, 2009, Defendant Maning Islands concluded a disposal trust contract with respect to the instant commercial building, which was located in the New Real Estate Trust Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “New Real Estate Trust”), and completed the registration of ownership transfer in the future of the New Real Estate Trust on October 5, 2009.

In addition, on October 1, 2009, a loan of KRW 800 million was made from the Korea Forest Mutual Savings Bank (hereinafter “Korea Forest Mutual Savings Bank”) and completed the registration of establishment of a neighboring mortgage (hereinafter “the registration of establishment of a neighboring mortgage”) with the maximum debt amount of KRW 1 billion,04,000,000,000 and the maximum debt amount of KRW 40,000,000.

After completing the registration of ownership transfer on January 13, 2010 with respect to the entire commercial buildings of this case, including the real estate list No. 1 and the real estate list No. 2 as indicated in the attached Table No. 2 (hereinafter “instant real estate”), the Defendant M&D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant International Asset Trust”) and the Defendant International Asset Trust Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant International Asset Trust”) on the same day, “the same day is below the real estate security trust agreement for the entire commercial