Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On June 12, 2013, at around 16:30, the Plaintiff reported the case to the police of B on the ground that B, who was residing near the Plaintiff, assaulted the Plaintiff. Police Officers C, etc. belonging to the Seosan Police Station, etc. investigated the Plaintiff’s criminal suspicion and sent the case to the prosecution.
B. On June 12, 2013, at around 16:30, the Plaintiff was convicted of having been sentenced to a fine under the Daejeon District Court Decision 2013Ma236, Jun. 24, 2014, on the charge that: (a) the Plaintiff was assaulted by B at the Plaintiff’s house; (b) the Plaintiff met with flab and flabed B’s head by cutting off and pushingly flabing flab, thereby causing injury to B, such as glabbbbing, glabbbing, glabing, gladging, gladging, and brare in the left-hand side in need of treatment for about two weeks; and
(hereinafter referred to as "criminal case"). (c)
On June 26, 2014, the Plaintiff appeared as a witness in a criminal case on April 8, 2014, and testified to the witness that “B made a false testimony to the effect that “B added B to the Plaintiff’s house fluent rice fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent c, but was subject to a disposition of perjury.
Although the Plaintiff filed an application for adjudication with Daejeon High Court Decision 2014 Seocho Jae-do828, on December 12, 2014, the Plaintiff was dismissed on December 12, 2014. The Plaintiff re-appealed to the dismissal ruling of the application for adjudication under the Supreme Court Decision 2014Mo3438, but it was final and conclusive on February 3, 2015.
On July 23, 2015, the Plaintiff appealed as Daejeon District Court 2014No1756, which was dissatisfied with the judgment of the first instance court. The said appellate court rendered a judgment of innocence on the ground that there is insufficient evidence to prove that B suffered bodily injury due to the Plaintiff’s act, and the Prosecutor appealed to the Supreme Court Decision 2015Do774, but the judgment of innocence became final and conclusive on July 23, 2015.
[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 to 6 shall be written in this court.