The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the defendant only committed an assault against the victim E, and did not inflict an injury by assaulting the victim E, such as harming the victim E by pressing the victim E or drinking. Even if the defendant suffered an injury in the course of pushing the victim for defensive defense, such act of the defendant is a passive defensive act to escape from unfair infringement on the body of the defendant, and thus constitutes self-defense. However, the court below found the defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case. The court below erred by misapprehending the facts, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by comprehensively taking account of the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below and the court below, namely, ① the victim made a concrete statement that the defendant had sustained an injury by assaulting, such as consistently putting the victim's fat, exposing fating the victim's face with drinking fat, destroying the victim's face with drinking fat, and destroying the victim's body, ② the defendant also recognized the fact that the victim's face and body was sealed, ③ the victim's fating and pushing the victim's bat, ③ the victim's batt with the victim's batt with the victim's bat, ③ the victim's batt with the victim's bat, after the victim's bat with the victim's intent, G can sufficiently recognize the fact that the victim suffered an injury by assaulting the victim, such as destroying the victim's fighting as stated in the judgment of the court below, and cannot be deemed as passive self-defense as a defensive act for the victim's unlawful infringement.

Therefore, the judgment of the court below that found the defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case is just, and the judgment of the court below affected the conclusion of the judgment by misunderstanding the facts as alleged by