Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. Summary of the facts charged
A. On May 17, 2013, the Defendant, at around 19:00 on May 17, 2013, the victim C (n, 49 years of age) who has a relationship of death in Gwangju Northern-gu B, has a conflict with one another due to the fact that the house is frequently unfolded.
In the floor of the knives of the victim, the body of the victim was cut off several times, the body of the victim was cut off several times due to the outbreak, and the victim's hair was blicked and the victim's hair was slicked.
B. The Defendant threatened the victim by stating, at the same time and at the same place, that “the victim did not kill the baby,” thereby undermining the victim.
2. Of the facts charged in the instant case, the charge of assault is a crime falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, and the charge of intimidation is a crime falling under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act, and the charge of intimidation is a crime falling under Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against each victim’s express intent under Article 283
However, according to the written withdrawal of a complaint and the written agreement, the victim may recognize the fact that he/she has withdrawn his/her wish to punish the defendant on June 7, 2012, which was after the institution of the prosecution of this case. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.