Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the Defendants did not pay each of the above fines, 50.

Criminal facts

Defendants and E are employees working in the (ju)G in Asia, and victims H(23 years of age) are university students.

At around 01:00 on May 23, 2013, the Defendants and E caused the occurrence of the victim and the trial expense on the grounds that the victim said that the victim was “hicked” on the front side of the JJ located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu. E took the victim’s face once a week, knee-knee-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne

The Defendants, in collaboration with E, inflicted bodily injury on the victim, such as the spathal of the baby in need of two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of the witness H;

1. Each statement of witness H, K and L in the fourth trial record;

1. The part concerning the statement of H, K, and L among the interrogation protocol of the police as to Defendant B

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. The Defendants and the defense counsel on the assertion of the CDA (CCTV video) Defendants and the defense counsel asserted that the Defendants were in a place far away from the scene of assaulting the victim E, and that the victim did not appear on the CCTV screen in which the victim’s face of assault was taken.

However, the victim, K, and L stated that the defendants were in combination with the assault against the victim of E and they followed several times as stated in the facts of the crime.

In addition, the following circumstances revealed by the aforementioned evidence, namely, ① the assault against the victim was caused by a verbal dispute between the victim and the defendant, ② the defendant C found the victim as "where there is a victim," and the victim respondeded to the victim's ‘explosion', and the victim came to her head towards the victim and E, ③ the defendant A stated in the police that the victim and the victim were able to live in dubs.