1. The defendant is about KRW 191,154,622, and KRW 5 million against Plaintiff B, respectively, to Plaintiff B’s administrator of inherited property.

1. Establishment of liability for damages;

A. The occurrence of liability: (1) On January 3, 2015, C driving a Done Star Vehicles (hereinafter “Defendant Vehicles”) around 16:50 and caused the death of the Defendant Company A due to the collision between two-lanes and three-lanes of vehicle C, and the Plaintiff B was in de facto in a de facto marital relation with the deceased Party A from July 29, 2011 to July 15, 201, and thus, the Defendant is not liable for damages arising from the Plaintiff’s failure to perform the duty of care and ice ice Tracking on the road while driving the three-lanes in the ice lap, and being towed from the ice lap, and thus, the Defendant is not liable for damages arising from the Plaintiff’s 201 to May 25, 2015 (hereinafter “instant accident”); and (3) the Defendant is not liable for damages arising from the marriage between the Plaintiff and the Defendant’s 105-Gaking Party B’s judgment on April 29, 2015, 2015.

B. Comprehensively taking account of the evidence set forth in the Evidence Nos. 5 through 8 (including paper numbers) as well as the descriptions and images of the evidence set forth earlier prior to the limitation of liability, ① The deceased completed the work at the construction site such as the driver, etc. of the Defendant Vehicle C, and was faced with the instant accident while boarding and returning to the Defendant vehicle, and ② the network A can be found to have been negligent in failing to wear the safety bell at the time of the instant accident, and the network A’s above negligence was caused by the occurrence and expansion of the damage caused by the instant accident.