Defendants are not guilty.

1. From March 2014 to February 2015, Defendant A, at the F Hospital located in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, worked as a fire extinguisher and doctor, and was engaged in the patient’s medical treatment operation, etc., and Defendant B, from March 2014 to March 2014, performed duties such as the patient’s medical treatment, prescription, and cooperation request, etc. at the time of the instant case under the direction of the said A.

Defendant

A, on December 15, 2014, the victim G (H life) who was in an emergency room of the above hospital was diagnosed as “astronomical shockitis” and implemented the “pactical shocking fluoring fluoral shocking fluoring fluoring fluoring fluor in the mouth.”

In treating the victims hospitalized after the operation, the Defendants were diagnosed as the aged and astronomical shockitis, and there was possibility that the astronomical shockitis might have occurred due to the amount of underflow in the mouth, and as a result, it was known that the merger or death rate would have increased significantly compared to the general shock infection in the operation. Accordingly, the Defendants were obliged to observe the progress of the victims, such as the removal of underflow amount through antibiotic medication and the removal of underflow amount through the custody of an antibiotic medication, and there was a duty of care to observe the progress and conduct follow-up inspections and treatment.

However, on January 13, 2015, the Defendants: (a) before and after the victim of the cerebral typhism symptoms, the victim was suspected of being infected with the during infection because the storage amount remains in the vicinity of the extension of the during (CT) examination; and (b) notwithstanding the fact that the outbreak and aggravation of agricultural products could have been anticipated, the victim was suspended from injection of the existing antibiotics and removed from the distribution amount, and did not take measures such as observation after the lapse and notification of additional antibiotics; and (c) the victim did not take measures such as taking measures to observe the progress and to re-hospitalize the antibiotics on January 28, 2015; and (d) the victim did not take measures to re-hospitalize the antibiotics.