1. Of the instant lawsuit, the Defendant’s industrial accident compensation insurance in April 23, 2010 against the Plaintiff, 207, 2008, 2008, and 2009.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff established for the purpose of manufacturing and selling parts of shipbuilding machinery and equipment on September 8, 199, and established its headquarters in Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun. Around 2002 and around 2005, the Plaintiff closed its business around April 2008, and the Plaintiff operated its headquarters and it operated its business at the head office and the rock plant (hereinafter “instant place of business”).

B. After the commencement of the business, the Plaintiff applied the type of the industrial accident compensation insurance (hereinafter “industrial accident insurance”) as “Gradic construction and repair business (22601)”. On March 31, 2010, the Plaintiff applied for the change of the type of business from 2007 to 2010, and filed an application for the change of the type of business with the Defendant from 2007 to 2010, and submitted the industrial accident compensation insurance premium report from 2007 to 2010, stating the type of business as “lease and service business.”

(A) This is the report to the effect that the final premium already paid from 2007 to 2009 and the estimated premium paid in 2010 are returned. (c)

On April 23, 2010, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, and 2010, the Defendant rendered a disposition to return an application for change of business type (hereinafter “disposition to return an application for change of business type”) to the effect that the business type of the Plaintiff falls under the strong building and repair business. The insurance premium return for the year 2007 and the year 2008 shall be deemed as the report of change of insurance premium, and the non-approval of the corrective report (hereinafter “non-approval of the corrective report”) was made on the ground that the period for filing the corrective report has already expired. As for the insurance premium return for the year 2009 and the year 2010, the Defendant applied the existing premium rate for the insurance premium return for the year 2009, 343,637, 480, 200, 303, 403, 306, 3636, 2086, 364.6