beta
Text
Defendant
A A shall be punished by a fine of two million won, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of one million won.
The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A, while Defendant B’s husband C and Spanish have been running the restaurant business, it became an issue of down payment and became a dispute.
1. Defendant B, at around 18:00 on August 22, 2019, told the Defendant’s husband, the Victim A (here, 56 years of age) “I would have her husband live with low women and her husband,” and she was flicked with the Victim’s arms, thickness, her chest, and her chest with the Victim’s body at one time, and was flicked with the Victim’s body, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the Victim, such as salt, tension, tension, etc., which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment.
2. Defendant A, at the time, at the time, and at the place specified in the above paragraph (1) above, sealed the victim B (at 56 years of age) and scambling, and laid down the victim’s face from the stairs, and laid down the victim’s scam scam which requires treatment for about 28 days in drinking.
Summary of Evidence
Facts No. 1
1. The defendant B's partial statement (a statement that there is a fact that the victim's body was displayed once and at the time, and at the place of the market that the victim's body was displayed once);
1. A’s legal statement;
1. A suspect interrogation protocol of the police officer;
1. The injury diagnosis report (10) and CCTV video CD Defendant B claimed that the Defendant’s act was self-defense. The Defendant’s act was self-defense. The Defendant’s arms, shoulders, and chests of the victim were not frighted. The Defendant’s act was self-defense.
However, the victims are specifically stated about the facts and circumstances of the damage as stated in its reasoning and are also consistent with the statements of investigation agencies.
The contents of the injury diagnosis report are consistent with this, and there is no part contrary to the victim's statement even the video recorded in the field CCTV, so the credibility of the statement should not be recognized.
The Defendant injured the victim as stated in its reasoning.
In addition, violence is first committed against the victim who did not participate in the part of the defendant.