logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2016.09.06 2016고단1765
일반교통방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 18, 2015, the National Democratic Union Federation of Workers' Unions (hereinafter referred to as the "Public Labor Union Federation") reported to the Seoul Southern Police Station on the assembly to hold approximately 10 'labor-morial Mortum resolution and national campaign' in front of the tendency newspaper building located in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government from September 21, 2015 to October 18, 2015.

On September 23, 2015, in the presence of approximately 5,50 members, such as union members, who are more than 100 assembly members reported from around 15:03 to around 19:10, the president of the private labor group took part in approximately 5,50 of the above trend newspaper, and went through the front of the road in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, by occupying the intersection, interesting building, and Sejong Culture Center, and by demonstration, the traffic of the vehicle was obstructed.

The Defendant participated in the above assembly from 15:19 to 16:31 of the same day, and participated in the assembly, and participated in the assembly with 5,500 other participants in other assemblies from 15:19 to 16:31 of the same day, and participated in the demonstration and interfere with the traffic of vehicles.

Accordingly, the defendant conspired with the above participants in the assembly and interfered with the traffic by land.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Evidentiary photographs;

1. Reports on internal investigation and investigation reports;

1. A report on the overall outline, face comparison, location of the roadway, and assembly;

1. The defendant's defense counsel's defense of each photographic counsel argues that the defendant's defense counsel has no intention to interfere with general traffic since the defendant, as a simple participant of the assembly, is considered to be an ordinary assembly at the time of arrival of the assembly, since the roadway has already been set up in a street and the stage has already been installed at the time of arrival of the assembly.

According to each of the above evidence, the first democratic labor force group reported the assembly by 100 persons participating in the above assembly, and 100 persons participating in the meeting in front of the tendency newspaper. However, the actual assembly participated in more than 5,500 persons reported, and all of the roads, not India, are occupied.

arrow