Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a XG car with the NEW franchise.

On June 13, 2016, around 08:27, the Defendant explained the 77-do Dacheon-ro, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, and proceeded two lanes among the two-lanes from the private distance room to the Jcheon Fire Station.

Since the location is where signal lights are installed, a person engaged in driving of a vehicle has a duty of care to proceed in accordance with good faith.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected his/her duty to stop in front of the Defendant, thereby driving a bicycle for a pedestrian motor on the crosswalk, thereby crossinging the crosswalk. (24) The Defendant received the victim E (24) in front of the Defendant’s vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as the right-hand streke and streke, which require approximately four weeks of treatment due to such occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Partial statement of the defendant's own protocol against the police;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. A survey report on actual condition, a traffic accident occurrence report, a sign-to-door signal cycle table, an investigation report (Attachment to data related to relocation of 3,00 square-distance crosswalks);

1. A medical certificate;

1. An on-site photograph by cutting a black stuffe image and cutting down it;

1. Application of statutes governing video files related to accidents;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents Aggravated Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order (the defendant and his defense counsel stated that the defendant and his defense counsel installed near the instant crosswalk and signals, etc. in the vicinity of a dunes of a dunes, and that the defendant may make a right-hand way without impeding the traffic of the vehicle. Thus, the defendant cannot be deemed to have violated the signal.

However, according to the above evidence duly adopted and examined, the above evidence is examined.