Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a ASEAN car.

On June 8, 2015, the Defendant driven the said car at a 0.167% alcohol level around 01:30, while under the influence of alcohol, and led to the intersection of the Gwangju Bank located 28 on the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju to turn back to the left at an irregular speed depending on one-lane between the two-lanes.

However, since there are many crossings for vehicles, there are duty of care to reduce the speed and to safely drive the vehicle on the one hand.

Nevertheless, as seen above, the Defendant did not avoid the victim C(the age of 36) driving the vehicle in the left part of the running direction of the Defendant’s vehicle and did not get out of the victim C(the age of 36) driving, and received the front part of the vehicle driving by the Defendant as the front part of the vehicle driving.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered from the victim’s occupational negligence, such as “damage to the father with a favorable care and the father of his/her retirement,” which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. A medical certificate;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes after making a report on the control of drinking driving;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3 (1), the proviso of Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (8) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the Selection of Punishment, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Article 148-2 (2) 2 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, and the selection of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act is that the Defendant was punished twice in 2005 and twice in 2014 due to drunk driving, and that the Defendant caused a traffic accident while driving under the influence of alcohol.

On the other hand, the victim also drives a violation of signal.