beta
Text
1. The judgment of the court of first instance, including the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff)’s counterclaim that was changed in this court, is as follows.
Reasons
A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.
1. Basic facts
A. The party’s relationship 1) The Plaintiff A (Rs) and the Defendant (the date of birth on the Defendant’s resident registration) are G or the actual date of birth as shown below, so that they are subject to this.
(2) On February 23, 2018, the appellate court rendered a dismissal judgment on the ground that the Defendant, who did not have the power of representation, filed a claim for the implementation of the procedure for the registration of ownership transfer on the ground of the cancellation of title trust against the Plaintiff A, who asserted that he was the representative of the clan around November 2015. The appellate court rendered a dismissal judgment on the ground that the Defendant, who did not have the power of representation, filed a claim for the registration of ownership transfer against the Plaintiff A without the resolution of the general meeting, was the Defendant’s filing without the resolution of the general meeting, and the above judgment became final and conclusive at that time.
(B) At around June 24, 2015, around 2015, around 2015, the Defendant 117Na1712, the Young-gu District Court (Cheongju District Court Decision 2015Da5131, Cheongju District Court 2017Na11712). (2) around June 25, 2015, the Defendant expressed that, in front of the Plaintiff’s house located in the U.S., the family land issues of the Plaintiff A, the Defendant expressed the Plaintiff who is not good for one another to listen to the Plaintiff’s house. (2) around June 25, 2015, the Defendant expressed the Plaintiff’s vegetable garden of the Plaintiff, “Ie, eleg, neighboring gue, chron, chrone, and Domine, Ie Mari-do so that I can listen to the Plaintiff’s desire to drive the Plaintiff’s house.”
3) On June 25, 2015, around 18:30 on June 25, 2015, the Defendant expressed the Plaintiff’s desire to take care of her neighbors so that they can hear. 4) On September 24, 2015, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1 million due to the criminal facts insulting Plaintiff A (Cheongju District Court Branch Branch Branch Decision 2015Da465) and the said summary order became final and conclusive around that time.
(c).