beta
Text
1. Defendant B, C, D, E, F, and G are with respect to each inheritance share listed in the separate sheet No. 1 of the 469 P, P, P, P, P, P, and the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. Defendant H’s clan (hereinafter “Defendant H”) is a clan consisting of H descendants, which jointly set up R R’s part of the R, which was brought into Q Q at the time of its racing.
B. On May 30, 1939, PP 469 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”) was originally owned by the network T. The network U purchased the instant land from the network T on behalf of the Defendant clan on May 30, 1939, and completed the registration of ownership transfer under the name of “V” on June 5, 1939.
C. On May 31, 2014, the Plaintiff purchased the instant land from Defendant clan as KRW 58,600,000.
On February 20, 200, the deceased on the part of Defendant B, C, D, E, F, and G succeeds to the property of Defendant B, D, E, F, and G deceased on June 1, 1955, and the deceased on the part of the deceased on the part of the deceased on the part of Defendant B, C, D, E, E, F, and G, and the deceased on the part of the deceased on the part of the deceased on October 25, 1965, and the deceased on the part of Defendant I, J, K, L, M, N, andO on the part of the deceased on the part of the inheritance shares in the attached list 2.
【Defendant B, C, D, E, F, G, J, K, M, and N: Defendant I (Article 150(3) of the Civil Procedure Act) by publication (Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act)
2. According to the above facts, upon the plaintiff's request by the defendant I, J, K, L, M, N,O, and the defendant's family subrogated (the true owner of the land in this case's registry is the defendant I, J, K, L, M, N, andO who is the deceased's heir, and thus the plaintiff seeks cancellation registration in succession to the above defendant's and the defendant's clan in succession), (1) in the event that the defendant B, C, D, E, F, and G, the deceased U's heir, filed a claim for cancellation registration by exercising the right of subrogation, in principle, the other party to the execution of the registration, or the creditor by exercising the right of subrogation, requested the third debtor to directly perform the procedure of cancellation of the right of subrogation, and won the third debtor by claiming cancellation of the right of subrogation, according to the registration of cancellation according to the decision of the court.