Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On May 31, 2015, the Defendant, in front of the “D convenience store located in Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, A” on the street, and on the ground that the Defendant, in the above toilets, told the victim E (55 years of age) of this breath, “humbing in width,” the Defendant spited the victim’s face, and caused the victim to suffer bodily injury, such as dynas, pump, and pump, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E and F;

1. A written statement;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. On-site and damaged photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reporting;

1. Article 257 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination on the assertion by the Defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. At the time of the occurrence of the damage by the victim, the Defendant, who received the trial cost, demanded the victim’s improper speech and behavior, but was punished by assaulting the victim’s head on the floor of the road by putting him/her head debt from the victim.

Accordingly, the Defendant spits the two arms in order to unbl the victim's face, spit them into the victim's face, and spit the victim's face in the process of spiting the victim's face, and blacks the victim's face and blacks the victim's face, so the Defendant's act does not constitute a legitimate defense or a legitimate act.

2. According to the evidence of the judgment, the Defendant’s act is simply the Defendant’s act in full view of the following: (a) the Defendant’s spit, spit, spit, and spit, before the convenience store; and (b) the Defendant’s act was initiated by spit, spit, following the process and content of the Defendant’s crime; (c) method and means of the crime; (d) the injured party’s part and degree of the injured party’s injury;