Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 80,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a resident of the 105-dong 1302 residing in Gwangju City, and the victim E is a person who works as the representative of the above apartment unit 105-dong 105-dong dong.

1. On January 11, 2013, at around 14:30, the Defendant was punished by a fine on the following grounds: (a) the Defendant returned to each of the foregoing apartment units 105 units; and (b) the consent to the dismissal of the 105 Dong Representative on April 27, 2012; (c) the document pertaining to the agenda at the neighborhood’s meeting around 105 Dong 1101, resulting in an injury to the same resident; and (d) the Defendant was punished by a fine on the following grounds:

The public announcement of "injury" was shown in Sungnam-do 2012 Gonam-do 20161, Sungnam-do 2012 Form 20139, and explained the contents thereof.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out facts.

2. Around 15:00 on February 18, 2013, the Defendant damaged the honor of the victim by openly pointing out false facts in the name of many people, such as public officials of the office of the Mapo-si, the head of the Dong, the head of the Dong, and the head of the general affairs.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant Article 307(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 307(2) of the Criminal Act, Article 307(2) of the Criminal Act, and the selection of each fine for a crime

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion of the provisional payment order against the defendant under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act and the defense counsel's assertion is for the benefit of the whole residents of the charged facts. Thus, since the defendant's act stated in paragraph (1) of this Article is for the benefit of the whole residents, illegality is excluded by Article 310 of the Criminal Act, the following circumstances acknowledged by each